This is a contender for worst card. Definitely in the top 10.
Posted By:
blindthrall
(12/16/2010 4:27:21 AM)
I wouldn't play it as an instant for 
.
Posted By:
KikiJikiTiki
(5/31/2011 7:46:15 PM)
I get that the flavor of the card strongly suggests non-repeatability, sacrificing land, and only against attackers, but why TWO lands? I'd kind of like to see the discussion wherein they concluded that sacking only one land would make this card too powerful.
Posted By:
oldtimer96
(4/14/2011 4:19:15 PM)
I'm keeping it around just in case Wizards ever prints a coyote creature of some kind.
Posted By:
Enemy_Tricolor
(11/17/2011 11:04:03 PM)
The picture is so dumb it's hilarious
Posted By:
StephenKukuchek
(12/17/2011 7:40:52 AM)
Now you too can trade three cards for one!
Posted By:
dingophone
(2/5/2012 8:54:54 PM)
Terravore was printed in the same set. It interacts fairly well with that. Sac two lands to kill your opponents attacking creature while pumping up your Terravore. That's got to count for somthing right.
Posted By:
aymanyayman
(3/29/2012 1:36:19 PM)
Destroys your opponent's Knight of the Reliquary, while giving your own Knight +2/+2! Broken!
Posted By:
SirZapdos
(5/19/2012 12:18:51 PM)
They never saw it coming
Posted By:
wazzzzzup
(1/26/2013 5:16:44 PM)
As bad as this is, I can see it being useful in sealed or draft. Removal for 
is not totally worthless -- I could see this card saving my life pretty often in a sealed tournament.
It's not something I would ever use if I have a choice, but it's not like some of the other worst cards, which are just totally useless period.
Posted By:
Aquillion
(5/13/2013 2:46:02 PM)